HGTC Ethnic Studies Immigration & International Obligations Questions

/ Discussion / By

This week’s videos describe a few of ways that one might attempt to argue for the claims that,

(a) US citizens are morally obligated to help another nation’s adults and/or children by allowing them entry into the US.

(b) US citizens are not morally obligated to help another nation’s adults and/or children by allowing them entry into he US.

This week’s tasks:

1) Select and provide an analysis of one of the PRO IMMIGRATION arguments described in this week’s videos/outline. Tell us which one you select and briefly summarize/restate it in your own words. Then, describe what you consider to be its strengths and weaknesses. For example, does each of the argument’s reasons seem to be true, plausible, etc.? Or, might one of more of the reasons seem false, implausible, etc.? Does the argument provide all that’s needed to convince one that its conclusion is true? If not, then what’s missing? Does the argument rely upon, assume, and/or incorporate some widely accepted/shared values/disvalues? Such will tend to make an ethical/moral argument more convincing. Or, might its assumed values/disvalues be too vague, too infrequently shared, etc., to be of much help?

2) Select and provide an analysis of one of the CON IMMIGRATION arguments described in this week’s videos/outline. Tell us which one you select and briefly summarize/restate it in your own words. Then, describe what you consider to be its strengths and weaknesses. For example, does each of the argument’s reasons seem to be true, plausible, etc.? Or, might one of more of the reasons seem false, implausible, etc.? Does the argument provide all that’s needed to convince one that’s its conclusion is true? If not, then what’s missing? Does the argument rely upon, assume, and/or incorporate some widely accepted/shared values/disvalues? Such will tend to make an ethical/moral argument more convincing. Or, might its assumed values/disvalues be too vague, too infrequently shared, etc., to be of much help?

3) Your decision. After considering the variety of PRO/CON immigration arguments described in this week’s videos/outline, does it seem likely that US citizens have a moral obligation to help another nation’s adults and/or children by allowing them into the US. If so, why so? If not, why not?

This week’s videos describe a few of ways that one might attempt to argue for the claims that, (a) US citizens are morally obligated to help another nation’s adults and/or children by allowing them entry into the US. (b) US citizens are not morally obligated to help another nation’s adults and/or children by allowing them entry into he US. This week’s tasks: 1) Select and provide an analysis of one of the PRO IMMIGRATION arguments described in this week’s videos/outline. Tell us which one you select and briefly summarize/restate it in your own words. Then, describe what you consider to be its strengths and weaknesses. For example, does each of the argument’s reasons seem to be true, plausible, etc.? Or, might one of more of the reasons seem false, implausible, etc.? Does the argument provide all that’s needed to convince one that its conclusion is true? If not, then what’s missing? Does the argument rely upon, assume, and/or incorporate some widely accepted/shared values/disvalues? Such will tend to make an ethical/moral argument more convincing. Or, might its assumed values/disvalues be too vague, too infrequently shared, etc., to be of much help? 2) Select and provide an analysis of one of the CON IMMIGRATION arguments described in this week’s videos/outline. Tell us which one you select and briefly summarize/restate it in your own words. Then, describe what you consider to be its strengths and weaknesses. For example, does each of the argument’s reasons seem to be true, plausible, etc.? Or, might one of more of the reasons seem false, implausible, etc.? Does the argument provide all that’s needed to convince one that’s its conclusion is true? If not, then what’s missing? Does the argument rely upon, assume, and/or incorporate some widely accepted/shared values/disvalues? Such will tend to make an ethical/moral argument more convincing. Or, might its assumed values/disvalues be too vague, too infrequently shared, etc., to be of much help? 3) Your decision. After considering the variety of PRO/CON immigration arguments described in this week’s videos/outline, does it seem likely that US citizens have a moral obligation to help another nation’s adults and/or children by allowing them into the US. If so, why so? If not, why not?

Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.