WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT: Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory

WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT

Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.

In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.

RESOURCES

To Prepare:

· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).

· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.

· Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.

· Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:

· Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)

· Clark (2018)

· Clark (2015)

· Griffin and Clark (2014)

*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.

The Assignment (3-6 pages total):

Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)

· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.

· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.

· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.

· Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)

· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.

· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.

· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.

Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)

· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

 

Workplace Environment Assessment

 

Name of Student

 

University

 

NURS 6053

 

Interprofessional Organization & System Leadership

 

Dr.

 

(Due date)

 

Workplace Environment Assessment

 

Introductory paragraph. The introduction presents the problem that the paper addresses. Write an introductory paragraph. Do not write the word Introduction as a level heading because the first paragraph under the title of the paper functions as your paper’s introduction. Include the purpose of the paper.

 

The purpose of this paper is to…… (continue stating the purpose of the paper).

 

Work Environment Assessment

 

Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this

 

Module’s Week 7 Discussion.

 

Do not include the assessment template in the paper. Just discuss the topics.

 

Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed

 

on your workplace.

 

Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior

 

to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed and explain what the results of the Assessment

 

suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.

 

Reviewing the Literature

 

Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.

 

Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.

 

Evidence-Based Strategies to create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams

 

Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

 

Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.

 

Summary or Conclusion

 

Conclusion on major points. The conclusion allows you to have the final say on the issues you have raised in your paper, to synthesize your thoughts and ideas, consider broader issues, elaborate on the significance of your findings and give your reader a new view of the subject, see things differently and enrich the reader’s way of thinking and perspective.

 

Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introductory paragraph, discussion topics, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.

 

References

 

NOTE: Delete the references and write your own list of references.

 

The following references are intended as examples only. Observe current, peer-reviewed and evidenced-based (not more than 5 years old.

 

If you used the references listed at the bottom of the Syllabus, you can copy and paste them to your paper and see to it that the references are following the hanging indentation.

 

Per the APA manual 7th edition, do not include “Retrieved from.” The words “Retrieved from” or “Accessed from” are no longer necessary before a URL.

 

Alexander, G., & Bonaparte, N. (2020). My way or the highway that I built. Ancient Dictators, 25(7), 14-31 . http://dx.doi.org:10.8220/CTCE.52.1.23-91

 

American Association of University Professors. (2020). Data snapshot: Contingent faculty in US higher ed. AAUP Updates . https://www.aaup.org/news/data-snapshotcontingent-faculty-us-higher-ed#.Xfpdmy2ZNR4

 

Babar, E., & Rosenthal R. (2021). The art of being a French elephant. Adventurous Cartoon Animals, 19, 4319-4392. http://www.elephants104.ace.org

 

Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (2020). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 48(3), 193–210. http://doi.org/cqcgsr

 

Bumstead, D. (2020). The essentials: Sandwiches and sleep. Journals of Famous Loafers, 5, 565-582. http://dx . doi.org:12.2847/CEDG.39.2.51-71

 

Cashin, W. E. (2021). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In M. Theall, & J. L. Franklin (Eds.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 113–121).

 

Davis, B. G. (2022). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

 

Denton, D. (2021). Responding to edTPA: Transforming practice or applying shortcuts? AILACTE Journal, 10(1), 19–36.

 

Hera, J. (2021). Why Paris was wrong. Journal of Greek Goddess Sore Spots, 20(4), 19-21. https:// doi: 15.555/GGE.64.1.76-82

 

Hoffman, R. A. (2020). Grade inflation and student evaluations of college courses. Educational and Psychological Research, 3(3), 51–160. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101557981

 

Howard, G., Conway, C., & Maxwell, S. (2020). Construct validity of measures of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 187–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.2.187

 

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2020). How to cite a video: The city is always Baltimore [DVD]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

 

Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2021). Name of program [Video webcast]. http://www.courseurl.com

 

Sinatra, F. (2021). Zing! Went the strings of my heart. Making Good Songs Great, 18(3), 31-22. http://articlesextollingrecordingsofyore.192/fs.com

 

Smasfaldi, H., Wareumph, I., Aeoli, Q., Rickies, F., Furoush, P., Aaegrade, V., … Fiiel, B. (2020). The art of correcting surname mispronunciation. New York, NY: Supportive Publisher Press. http://www.onewaytociteelectronicbooksperAPA7.02.com


WORKPLACE ENVIRONMENT ASSESSMENT
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
RESOURCES
To Prepare:
· Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
· Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
· Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
· Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
· Clark (2018)
· Clark (2015)
· Griffin and Clark (2014)
*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
· Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
 
Workplace Environment Assessment
 
Name of Student
 
University
 
NURS 6053
 
Interprofessional Organization & System Leadership
 
Dr.
 
(Due date)
 
Workplace Environment Assessment
 
Introductory paragraph. The introduction presents the problem that the paper addresses. Write an introductory paragraph. Do not write the word Introduction as a level heading because the first paragraph under the title of the paper functions as your paper’s introduction. Include the purpose of the paper.
 
The purpose of this paper is to…… (continue stating the purpose of the paper).
 
Work Environment Assessment
 
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this
 
Module’s Week 7 Discussion.
 
Do not include the assessment template in the paper. Just discuss the topics.
 
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed
 
on your workplace.
 
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior
 
to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed and explain what the results of the Assessment
 
suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
 
Reviewing the Literature
 
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected. Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment. Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
 
Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
 
Evidence-Based Strategies to create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams
 
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
 
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
 
Summary or Conclusion
 
Conclusion on major points. The conclusion allows you to have the final say on the issues you have raised in your paper, to synthesize your thoughts and ideas, consider broader issues, elaborate on the significance of your findings and give your reader a new view of the subject, see things differently and enrich the reader’s way of thinking and perspective.
 
Reminder: The School of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introductory paragraph, discussion topics, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm ). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
 
References
 
NOTE: Delete the references and write your own list of references.
 
The following references are intended as examples only. Observe current, peer-reviewed and evidenced-based (not more than 5 years old.
 
If you used the references listed at the bottom of the Syllabus, you can copy and paste them to your paper and see to it that the references are following the hanging indentation.
 
Per the APA manual 7th edition, do not include “Retrieved from.” The words “Retrieved from” or “Accessed from” are no longer necessary before a URL.
 
Alexander, G., & Bonaparte, N. (2020). My way or the highway that I built. Ancient Dictators, 25(7), 14-31 . http://dx.doi.org:10.8220/CTCE.52.1.23-91
 
American Association of University Professors. (2020). Data snapshot: Contingent faculty in US higher ed. AAUP Updates . https://www.aaup.org/news/data-snapshotcontingent-faculty-us-higher-ed#.Xfpdmy2ZNR4
 
Babar, E., & Rosenthal R. (2021). The art of being a French elephant. Adventurous Cartoon Animals, 19, 4319-4392. http://www.elephants104.ace.org
 
Bachen, C. M., McLoughlin, M. M., & Garcia, S. S. (2020). Assessing the role of gender in college students’ evaluations of faculty. Communication Education, 48(3), 193–210. http://doi.org/cqcgsr
 
Bumstead, D. (2020). The essentials: Sandwiches and sleep. Journals of Famous Loafers, 5, 565-582. http://dx . doi.org:12.2847/CEDG.39.2.51-71
 
Cashin, W. E. (2021). Students do rate different academic fields differently. In M. Theall, & J. L. Franklin (Eds.), Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice. New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 113–121).
 
Davis, B. G. (2022). Tools for teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
 
Denton, D. (2021). Responding to edTPA: Transforming practice or applying shortcuts? AILACTE Journal, 10(1), 19–36.
 
Hera, J. (2021). Why Paris was wrong. Journal of Greek Goddess Sore Spots, 20(4), 19-21. https:// doi: 15.555/GGE.64.1.76-82
 
Hoffman, R. A. (2020). Grade inflation and student evaluations of college courses. Educational and Psychological Research, 3(3), 51–160. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:101557981
 
Howard, G., Conway, C., & Maxwell, S. (2020). Construct validity of measures of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 187–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.77.2.187
 
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2020). How to cite a video: The city is always Baltimore [DVD]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
 
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). (2021). Name of program [Video webcast]. http://www.courseurl.com
 
Sinatra, F. (2021). Zing! Went the strings of my heart. Making Good Songs Great, 18(3), 31-22. http://articlesextollingrecordingsofyore.192/fs.com
 
Smasfaldi, H., Wareumph, I., Aeoli, Q., Rickies, F., Furoush, P., Aaegrade, V., … Fiiel, B. (2020). The art of correcting surname mispronunciation. New York, NY: Supportive Publisher Press. http://www.onewaytociteelectronicbooksperAPA7.02.com

Why Choose Us

  • 100% non-plagiarized Papers
  • 24/7 /365 Service Available
  • Affordable Prices
  • Any Paper, Urgency, and Subject
  • Will complete your papers in 6 hours
  • On-time Delivery
  • Money-back and Privacy guarantees
  • Unlimited Amendments upon request
  • Satisfaction guarantee

How it Works

  • Click on the “Place Your Order” tab at the top menu or “Order Now” icon at the bottom and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • Fill in your paper’s requirements in the "PAPER DETAILS" section.
  • Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • Click “CREATE ACCOUNT & SIGN IN” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.